DLO ⊢ ∀ u̅ ( φ ↔ ψ ).
Prove that there is no theory Σ such that every model of Σ is a wellordering and Σ has an infinite model.
Assume that ( | A | , RA ) is a wellordering.
A = ( ℝ , 0A , 1A, | ⋅ | A, +A , -A , ×A , ÷A , <A )
be a structure with the standard zero, one, absolute value, addition, subtraction, multiplication and division (made total) and less than.
Let π : A ≈ A* ≼ B be as in § 4.4.
Define a relation ≡ on | B | by setting x ≡ y iff y -B x ∈ Finite ( B ).
(Here we write [ x ] for the equivalence class of x.)
Let A be as in Exercise 4.7.
Let π : A ≈ A* ≼ B be as in § 4.4.
Let y ∈ Finite ( B ) - | A* |.
Prove that there is a unique way to write y as x +B δ where x ∈ | A* | and δ is infinitesimal.
(x is called the standard part of y.)
Follow this hint:
Let S = { x ∈ | A* | ∣ x <B y }.
Say why S is nonempty and S has an upper bound in A*.
We know that A has the least upper bound property. (Do not include a proof of this fact!)
Explain why A* has the least upper bound property too.
Therefore, S has a least upper bound in A*.
Let x = lub ( S ).
Let δ = y -B x.
Prove that δ is an infinitesimal.
Prove that if y = x' +B δ' where x' ∈ | A* | and δ' is an infinitesimal, then x' = x and δ' = δ.
Use the language from Exercise 4.8 expanded by a unary function symbol F.
Use A from Exercise 4.8 expanded so that FA = f.
Let π : A ≈ A* ≼ B be as in § 4.4.
Prove that the following are equivalent.
For every real number s > 0, there exists a real number r > 0 such that for every real number x, if | x | < r, then | f ( x ) - f ( 0 ) | < s.
Let Ai for i ∈ I be structures with a common language.
Let B = Ult ( < Ai ∣ i ∈ I > , U ).
Assume that U is principal.
In other words, there exists i ∈ I such that U = { X ⊆ I ∣ i ∈ X }
Prove that B is isomorphic to Ai.
Let U be a nonprincipal ultrafilter over ω.
Let B = Ult ( A , U ).
Draw as accurate a picture of B as you can and justify the elements of your picture with proofs.
Say AΔ ⊨ Δ for all finite Δ ⊆ Σ.
Let I = { Δ ⊆ Σ ∣ Δ is finite }.
For Δ ∈ I, let XΔ = { Γ ∈ I ∣ Δ ⊆ Γ }.
Let F = { Y ⊆ I ∣ Y ⊇ XΔ for some Δ ∈ I }.
Let B = Ult ( < AΔ ∣ Δ ∈ I > , U ).
Prove that B ⊨ Σ.
A = ( ℝ , 0A , 1A, | ⋅ | A, +A , -A , ×A , ÷A , <A )
be a structure with the standard zero, one, absolute value, addition, subtraction, multiplication and division (made total) and less than.
Let U be a nonprincipal ultrafilter over ω.
Let B = Ult ( A , U ) and π : A ≈ A* ≼ B be as in § 4.7.
As a reminder, by definition, π ( x ) = [ n ↦ x ]U where n ↦ x is the function from ω to ℝ with constant value x.
Prove that [ n ↦ n ]U is an infinite element of | B | in the sense that for every x ∈ ℝ,
π ( x ) <B [ n ↦ n ]U.
Prove that [ n ↦ ( 1 / n ) ]U is an infinitesimal element of | B | in the sense that for every positive x ∈ ℝ,
π ( 0 ) <B [ n ↦ ( 1 / n ) ]U <B π ( x ).
The upward and downward Löwenheim-Skolem theorems
in Chapter 4 only distinguish between finite, countable and uncountable
languages, structures and sets.
More generally, the cardinality of a structure is the cardinality
of its universe.
Then there exists an elementary substructure A of B with X ⊆ | A |
such that A has the same cardinality as X.
Say A has cardinality κ and λ > κ.
Then there exists an elementary extension B of A such that
the cardinality of B is λ.
Exercise 4.14
(This exercise is for those with more set theory background.)
We make some definitions to be used in the four exercises that follow.
For us, the language of Boolean algebras will have two constant symbols, t and f, a unary function symbol N, two binary function symbols A and O, and a binary relation symbol I. The theory of Boolean algebras (BA) has the following ten axioms.
Intuitively, t stands for "true", f stands for "false", N stands for "not", A stands for "and", O stands for "or", and I stands for "implies".
The theory of atomless Boolean algebras (ABA) has one additional axiom:
∀ v [ ¬ ( v ≈ F ) → ∃ u [ I ( u , v ) ∧ ¬ ( f ≈ u ) ∧ ¬ ( u ≈ v ) ]
Let Σn be the set of propositional sentences that involve only Pi for i < n.
Let ╞╡n be the propositional logical equivalence relation restricted to Σn.
Recall that ╞╡n is an equivalence relation on Σn.
Define structures Bn in the language of Boolean algebras by:
| Bn | = Σn / ╞╡n
In other words, for each φ ∈ Σn, the equivalence class
[ φ ]n = { ψ ∈ Σn | ψ ╞╡n φ }
is a member of | Bn | , and these are all the members.
It is easy to see that these definitions of N Bn , A Bn , O Bn , and I Bn do not depend on the choice of representatives.
It is easy to see that each Bn is a finite model of the Associativity, Commutativity, Distributivity, Identity and Complementation axioms.
Explain why C3 is not isomorphic to any of the Boolean algebras Bn from Exercise 4.15.
| Ca | = P ( a ) = { X | X ⊆ a }
and, for all members X and Y of | Ca |,
I Ca ( X , Y ) iff X ⊆ Y.
Hint for 4.16.3 For y ∈ | D |, define y to be an atom of D iff
y ≠ f D and, for every x, if x I D y , then x = f D or x = y.
Let a be the number of atoms of D.
Let Σ be the set of propositional sentences.
Recall that the propositional logical equivalence relation ╞╡ is an equivalence relation on Σ.
Define structures B in the language of Boolean algebras by:
| B | = Σ / ╞╡
In other words, for each φ ∈ Σ , the equivalence class
[ φ ] = { ψ ∈ Σ | ψ ╞╡ φ }
is a member of | B | , and these are all the members.
It is easy to see that these definitions of N B , A B , O B , and I B do not depend on the choice of representatives.
It is easy to see that B is a countable Boolean algebra.
Explain why B is an atomless.
Let C and D be atomless Boolean algebras.
Prove that π is an isomorphism from C to D.
Use a back and forth argument to prove there is an isomorphism from ( | C | , I C ) to ( | D | , I D ).
Hints for Exercise 4.18
For Part 1, start by proving that, for all x, y ∈ | C |,
OC ( x , y ) = the I C -least z such that x I C z and y I C z.
For Part 2, start by fixing enumerations of the two universes:
| C | = { x0 , x1 , ... , xn , ... }
| D | = { y0 , y1 , ... , yn , ... }
By recursion on n ∈ ω, define
Sn ⊆ | C |
Tn ⊆ | D |
πn : A ↾ Sn ≈ B ↾ Tn
such that
Sn , Tn and πn are finite
xn ∈ Sn + 1
yn ∈ Tn + 1
Sn is the universe of a substructure of C
Tn is the universe of a substructure of D
More hints for both parts of Exercise 4.18 might be added later.
(As it stands, it is a bit harder than others.)